Top 8 Finals System

cochise

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
17,171
Have been a little bored today so have been having a look at a finals system I created a few years ago. I always like the old top 4 and top 5 models that allowed the top teams to keep their 2nd chance all the way to the Grand Final if they kept winning. The biggest downfall is the finals would run an extra week and the team that wins the Major Semi would have only played 1 game in a month but that was the same in the old top 5 as well.
![Top8 finals.png](/assets/uploads/files/1602659397441-top8-finals.png)
 
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248002) said:
Top 5 only

The revenue that the top 8 brings in won’t allow that again.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248005) said:
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248002) said:
Top 5 only

The revenue that the top 8 brings in won’t allow that again.

I fully understand the economics of a top 8 systems but it really rewards
Some poor sides who finish 6 to 8 spot.
Top 5.
1 gets a rest.
2 plays 3 loser survives
4 plays 5 lower gone
Teams 1, 2 and 3 all get second chances
 
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248007) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248005) said:
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248002) said:
Top 5 only

The revenue that the top 8 brings in won’t allow that again.

I fully understand the economics of a top 8 systems but it really rewards
Some poor sides who finish 6 to 8 spot.
Top 5.
1 get a rest.
2 plays 3 loser survives
4 plays 5 lower gone
Teams 1, 2 and 3 all get second chances

It does award poor sides. What’s it say about us
 
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248007) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248005) said:
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248002) said:
Top 5 only

The revenue that the top 8 brings in won’t allow that again.

I fully understand the economics of a top 8 systems but it really rewards
Some poor sides who finish 6 to 8 spot.
Top 5.
1 gets a rest.
2 plays 3 loser survives
4 plays 5 lower gone
Teams 1, 2 and 3 all get second chances

Mate, love the system but just won't happen.
 
if we expand the competitions to 20 and have a top 10 system

Then lets make the old top 5 system but double

1,3,5,7,9 in one top 5 system
2,4,6,8,10 in other top 5 system

winner of each which is like winning the grand final in the old top 5 system would play each other in a major grand final.
 
@Magpie1969 said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248002) said:
Top 5 only

We can't even make a top 8, what chance would we have at making the top 5
 
@BigUnit said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248042) said:
if we expand the competitions to 20 and have a top 10 system

Then lets make the old top 5 system but double

1,3,5,7,9 in one top 5 system
2,4,6,8,10 in other top 5 system

winner of each which is like winning the grand final in the old top 5 system would play each other in a major grand final.

I've said before if you go with 20 teams, you'd have 10 nsw teams and 10 outside nsw.
You could have top 5 for conference.
And you essentially get 3 grand finals.
 
@frullens said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248052) said:
@BigUnit said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248042) said:
if we expand the competitions to 20 and have a top 10 system

Then lets make the old top 5 system but double

1,3,5,7,9 in one top 5 system
2,4,6,8,10 in other top 5 system

winner of each which is like winning the grand final in the old top 5 system would play each other in a major grand final.

I've said before if you go with 20 teams, you'd have 10 nsw teams and 10 outside nsw.
You could have top 5 for conference.
And you essentially get 3 grand finals.

I like the conference idea. I tried to make a mock one, semi-mimicking the NFL. So teams were split into 4 divisions :

Final week 1
* winner of each division has week off
* teams 2 + 3 play each other in elimination match

Finals week 2
* Winner week 1 plays winner of the division
* Loser eliminated

Finals week 3
* Division A week 2 winner vs Division B week 2 winner
* Division A week 2 winner vs Division D week 2 winner
* losers eliminated

Final
* winners from week 3 play for premiership

Not sure if it's "ideal" though because every finals match is elimination - i.e. no "losers" get a second change, regardless of where they finished in the regular season. Also, it becomes more like a top 12 so without more teams, its not great..
 
Nrl gets the gate from finals, clubs get regular season. Top 16 has a better chance that top 5 despite 5 being the better option.

There has only been 3-4 teams In This comp all year anyway. Just do a full season everyone plays everyone 2x and first past the post wins
 
@BigUnit said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248042) said:
if we expand the competitions to 20 and have a top 10 system

Then lets make the old top 5 system but double

1,3,5,7,9 in one top 5 system
2,4,6,8,10 in other top 5 system

winner of each which is like winning the grand final in the old top 5 system would play each other in a major grand final.

Like the idea but the playing pool is just not there. In fact 16 might be too many.
Make it a 14 team Como and a top 7 with the top team having a week off.
 
Why couldn't the NRL run a top 5 format, forgo the week of finals and top the season up to be a proper H&A comp? Surely that would be worth more to them...
 
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Top 8 Finals System](/post/1248109) said:
Why couldn't the NRL run a top 5 format, forgo the week of finals and top the season up to be a proper H&A comp? Surely that would be worth more to them...

Yes but could you imagine the number of games that teams would be out of contention for the top 5.
 
Back
Top