kiwitiger
Well-known member
I would like this too. Seems crazy it is not the caseWhen a player goes off with a hia that player must sub the player that went on for them back off
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would like this too. Seems crazy it is not the caseWhen a player goes off with a hia that player must sub the player that went on for them back off
It's a lottery these daysI'm getting over the influence of bombs on the outcome and direction of the game. While I appreciate the athleticism of some the players to field them it's like spinning a wheel and hoping for the best in terms of the adjudication by the ref and bunker - as to who contested, who disrupted, who had eyes on the ball, who touched it, did it go forward or back, who was onside - all discretionary and often not definitive but crucial in relation to the ruling.
I like that GNR.Golden point should be golden try. You can still kick field goals in GP, but it won’t finish the match. The only thing that will is a try.
What constitutes a bomb though? How high are we allowing balls to travel? Are cross field kicks not allowed? How high can they be? These are the big questions that need to be answered.I like that GNR.
And what about a really big change, No tries from bombs ! Radical eh but once upon a time they didn’t exist.
Doesn’t happen in NFL and still quite exciting.
I’ll wait for the feedback !!
I’m suggesting no kicking can lead to a try so I don’t care if it’s up, across, grubber or backwards.What constitutes a bomb though? How high are we allowing balls to travel? Are cross field kicks not allowed? How high can they be? These are the big questions that need to be answered.
Been watching a lot of 90’s games lately. Was anything goes compared to now. Watched one last night where two players attacked the legs of a winger going up for a bomb. Play on.It's a lottery these days
Once upon a time I could see an incident and know what the ruling should be... Not the case anymore it's just all very random
I'm not too sure on this oneSuspensions….
A player should serve their suspension only against the team they committed the offence against. If the player changes clubs the suspension continues with the player to the new club.
Eg. JWH cops a 4wk suspension for elbowing a Raiders player. He can’t play the Raiders for 4 games.
This way the club the offence occurred agaibst keeps the advantage the next time the teams meet instead of the following week/s team.
Rep games don’t apply to club games with players to receive 1-3 game bans only. “Danny Williams style” issues to carry harsher bans.