Mighty_Tiger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2009
- Messages
- 6,460
Was Vegas really the success they want us to believe?
of the 40,000 who attended the game over 20,000 were from Australia and the U.K.
tickets were given away on the Vegas strip to anyone who would take one.
it cost the NRL a bomb to get this off the ground.
PVL said the measure to success was how many Yanks would watch the game on Fox in the US.
well the US tv ratings are in…
despite a big lead in audience from the basketball game that preceded the First NRL game , only 60,000 yanks watched the first game and only 40,000 watched the 2nd game.
so, 100,000 Yanks tuned out after the Basketball game, and a further 20,000 tuned out after the first NRL game, despite being in prime time…
only 60,000 Yanks tuned into game 1, taking population numbers into account, that’s equivalent to 7,300 Aussie's tuning into Fox league to watch an NRL game….Big fail!!!
im not surprised…waste of money
Always find it interesting when people quote numbers.
If anyone thought we would be a success year 1 let alone year 5 is dreaming it will take a good 10-20yrs of consistent investment to have a crack at turning things around financially. Playing 1 day a year for a sport that they have no idea about is hardly going to make a dent. They need to get a local investor to buy into the game much like what happened with the MLS boom.
40k in Australia is a good crowd, getting that in another country isn’t a negative. They give tickets away locally all the time heck some of the teams that played struggle on a good day to get half that crowd. They give tickets away to world cups, Olympics & even NBA games. Breaking it down to Aussie/UK etc is irrelevant you don’t see that get broken down for Magic Round or other sports events…..
Viewership is the concern and how that translates into Betting and Subscriptions, but you get what you pay for. They went with Fox Sports which has a low subscription base. Heck the 1st 10mins of game one was on Fox Sports 2 then flipped over to Fox Sports 1 so viewers on FS1 missed the opening 10mins. They didn’t pay for prime time or have leverage to make moves here they went budget route and it shows with results.
It will be interesting as to if the betting market deals happen & what the growth in watch nrl subscriptions will be - that’s where the money is not in ticket sales or Fox Sports viewers.
If they get 10k subscribers on watchnrl its $2.5m inbound, if they get 60k it’s 15m, 100k it’s $25m, 1m it’s 250m a season (I doubt they will get 10k in 5yrs).
If they get .5% of the betting market it’s roughly $48m minimum a year, 1% close to $100m a year.
Those 2 are the market plays.
On the flip side Fox Sports AU coverage numbers showed the opening games were the most watched Fox Sports AU games according to guys on NRL 360 (haven’t seen the formal numbers).
In 2 nba games yesterday I watched the commentary mentioned players making a rugby tackle when coming together in the game - referring to the weekend - 1 game they said these guys aren’t brutal and would get spanked (referring to league so we have an identity issue already). The point is that an impression be it small was made which found that interesting.
Time will tell if it’s a waste of money, I don’t see how it can be a success but I also won’t write it off right now. With all good investments you need to spend money to make money. Stick to the plan and evaluate at the junction point - which is in 5yrs by the sounds of things.