king_sirro
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2009
- Messages
- 7,840
And won by 2.
Finally we take the bloody 2.
Finally we take the bloody 2.
We took the 2
- Thread starter king_sirro
- Start date
innsaneink
Well-known member
Yeah...
What I'm concerned about is dying with the ball 10m out from their line.... Too scared to kick. I guess it's a move when we're in front but it's another thing just goes against what Sheens was saying pre season
We do this next week we'll get slaughtered
What I'm concerned about is dying with the ball 10m out from their line.... Too scared to kick. I guess it's a move when we're in front but it's another thing just goes against what Sheens was saying pre season
We do this next week we'll get slaughtered
upthetigers
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 3,338
And we kicked crucial goals from the sideline. Finally kicking wins us the game.
Talau got it on the last tackle, a couple of times today.
Poor choice.
Poor choice.
bythebeardofzeus
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 608
Agree. I would’ve liked us run the ball through the hands a bit more but with bodies in motion, changing angles & at pace etc. We just looked a little pedestrian at times but at least we were turning the ball over on their 10m line. Hopefully this builds our confidence further & we start to click in the red zone.
king_sirro
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2009
- Messages
- 7,840
I agree. We aren't backing ourselves to get a repeat set.
innsaneink
Well-known member
Win by 4 last week
2 this week.
1 again next week?
I'd take it
2 this week.
1 again next week?
I'd take it
BrissieTiger67
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 1,079
Draw the following week, then lose by 2, then lose by 4 ...etc 😋😋
king_sirro
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2009
- Messages
- 7,840
He'll yea I'd take it.
Fraze23
Well-known member
I don't understand why we didn't take the 2 on full time. It was certainly in range and would contribute to our for and against. I didn't get that.
It’s because we have shown no ability to not kick it dead. Handing it over 5m out in the corner is a much better outcome than giving the a 7 tackle set from the 20m line which we were doing more often then not
tig_prmz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 1970
- Messages
- 11,855
Repeat sets are a lot easier to get from the 20 than inside the 10 as defence is moving up and they all play at the ball, need to be aiming to kick on the 3rd or 4th in the 20 to get a repeat set.
Tiger Woods
Well-known member
Flippedy
Well-known member
Bloody oath! Especially against Souths
Tigertilidie32
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 122
When ice was more of a chance both times
Tigertilidie32
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 122
Ball hits post and they run it all the way back ? Only reason I took from it.
We beat them by 1 last year, here's hoping for a repeat
InBenjiWeTrust
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 6,249
Or win by 50, 60, 40, 39...
AL The Tiger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 3,130
Might also be that Sheens thinks kicking for repeat sets is no longer worth the risk as teams are now going short constantly and getting results. However, I think if we're going to go for it on the fifth they should at least throw the ball around and take the risk rather than just going one out and dying with the ball for field position. We are meant to be an "attacking" team after all
Staff online
-
DempsModerator