Search results

If you say so. I guess value is subjective

Just because they are cheap, it doesn't make it moneyball. Cotric would be a money waste.

You're right, but it's probably frustration creeping in where we need calls to go our way to compete in some games, and the inevitable luck of the draw when it comes to ref errors probably impacts us more because we struggle as a team in the first place. Every team gets bad decisions. At 50-0...

Easing Latu in isn't a bad thing. Sezer or Galvin will get injured and he is next man up in the halves. Having him in the team each week and getting game time with his team mates will help him and he covers a few positions.

The NRL. It's common knowledge in league circles that players will take contracts at other clubs from time to time.

Mate you are elite. You definitely called it. You are pretty good judge of talent I'd say. Have you thought of approaching the club for a job? Your resume could be all your posts where you've called it early

Also extra cigarettes and beers will help.

We'll drop our bundle here

A couple of quality wingers and a decent lock and we are in a different league. We are troubling them, but have no class to finish it off. Can't understand the Api no try. The most basic decisions go against us when it comes to conceding or scoring points. We always pay a heavy price for ref...

Douehi and To'a off contract and probably worth around $750k on the cap. Naden and Staines off at the end of 25 probably worth around the same. We need at least one gun winger to have a competitive backline. We really do give up a lot with a winger that can't start our sets off on the front foot.

Plays 2nd row where we are light on troops. Could be a good pick up for our situation, but the concern is the court case distraction amongst other things.

Mate that is the NRL website I've quoted. You'd better get onto them and tell them their definition of mutual option is wrong. Where does your info come from out of interest? Can you point to a mutual option that was exercised like you describe?

I don't think that's quite right Frodo. Otherwise you would call it a player option or club option. A mutual option would indicate bot parties need to agree. From the NRL website...

Klemmer signed a 3 year deal and is in his second. If he comes next year, playing off the bench for a year as understudy won't be a big deal. Stef may leave also. I doubt Tigers exercise their end of the mutual option with Klemmer for a 4th year, so either way, we'll need at least one starting...

Where you been?

Listen, it's obviously not ideal, but here's a second question. Everyone is saying what not to do, but the same people will be saying how we should have tried harder to keep all 3 if they are playing out of their skins and one leaves because we keep carrying one on the bench. In that...

Let's be honest. None of us have seen him defends in the middle. The only way we know is if he gets a shot there in state cup. I agree that in theory, his running game and size would be ideal for 13.

Don't give yourself so much credit to get under my skin. Just pointing out your hypocrisy. "Lame", "Cool story", ï got under your skin", "Fail". What are you a teenage girl? Man up a little son.

Seyfarth and Doueihi? Doueihi can't even defend.

Galvin is number 1 priority. That kid lives and breathes football. He doesn't go to parties apparently, comes from a good family, doesn't drink. We need to take care of him at this club. If Latu leaves, I'm prepared to cop that if it means Galvin is kept.